Monthly Archives

57 Articles

Option Agreement Wind Farm

The addition of a number of electric car batteries removed from discarded electric cars to a wind project, for example. B with a few per turbine, to overcome imbalance problems, should not have a significant impact on other project facilities or require large additional areas or infrastructure. A larger, high-volume battery farm, which uses the same wind farm, another project or other projects, would require lines in the bank from the generators and from the bank to the substation, as well as communication lines and a particular staging/security area, but otherwise a discreet and localized installation, which is no different from other fixed installations. Other storage technologies, such as pumped hydropower, compressed air, etc., would be larger for land/surfaces and would require much more complex control of permits and location due diligence and agreements. C. Combined wind/solar contracts. While this is still the exception rather than the rule, occasionally there will be a combined wind/solar location agreement that will allow one or both to develop wind and solar on the same site. In addition to the synergistic benefits that can be achieved through nearby projects that share certain infrastructure and improvements, the joint location of wind and solar projects has other consequences, both for the developer and the landowner. For the landowner, the question of how much land is used / will not be available to the landowner, what will be the amount of compensation for losses of use of the country, how an expected royalty or electricity generation payment is calculated and how wind and sun are treated differently in the agreement with regard to location requirements, compensation plans, etc. While it is unlikely that intensive solar development can be expected over the entire area of a large wind project site, it is not so difficult to imagine that solar development could affect some wind project plots and areas more than others, and therefore it can be useful to a landowner approached by a wind and/or solar site management agreement. A.

Community Organizations. It is not uncommon for projects in the immediate vicinity, especially those from the same underlying developer and the same initial location agreement, to use certain project facilities together. Economies of scale achieved by sharing facilities between or near related projects can also make marginalised project sites economically viable. The sharing and allocation of costs related to the authorisation, development, operation and maintenance of installations such as substations and joint switching stations, as well as related new transmission or line extension modernisations, operational control and control and data collection devices, access roads and other necessary facilities that can serve more than one project, may cover the costs of each participating project. t….

Oge Ethics Agreements

The Ethical Service Handbook for Executive Branch Employees [pdf] provides an introduction to the fundamental ethical obligations of public service. The content focuses on three ethical service expectations: awareness, commitment and responsibility. The brochure contains room for agency-specific content and the EMB encourages agencies to rate the brochure to highlight important ethical issues that are relevant to the work of their staff. These records contain declarations and amended declarations on personal and family property and other property interests; income; gifts and refunds; liabilities; agreements and arrangements; outdoor positions; and other information relating to conflicts of interest. Such declarations may be certificates of absence of new interest for the reference period and may constitute additional or alternative confidential reporting forms of the Agency. If a delegate does not comply with the terms and timing of their ethics agreement, the EMB Director will take appropriate action (pdf). These measures may include refusing certification of the representative`s annual disclosure report and/or notifying the head of the agency or the White House. One. Any staff member designated to fulfill the obligations of a date described in point 4.31 must submit a public disclosure report to the EO. A public applicant may be asked to comply with an ethics agreement aimed at resolving potential or actual conflicts of interest.

4.17. « Ethics Assistant » or « Ethics Specialist » refers to the various staff members of the Office of Ethics who provide technical and procedural instructions for the management of the USDA Ethics Program. These individuals meet the day-to-day requirements of the USDA Ethics Program, including the implementation of ethics training; the collection, verification and certification of confidential disclosure and public service reports; and advising staff on specific ethical issues or questions. 4.25. « Office of Ethics » (OE) is a separate office within the OFFICE OF THE GENERAL Counsel (OGC) that is delegated pursuant to 7 CFR 2.201 for the operation and management of the USDA Ethics Program in accordance with 5 CFR Part 2638. The Office of Ethics manages the public and confidential financial reporting program for the entire USDA, in accordance with the authority conferred by the Secretary through the DAEO, assists in the development of alternative or short disclosure reports, and obtains EMB authorization for the reassessment of equivalent classifications of positions requiring financial disclosure. . . .

Notes To Agreement

Once the main terms of the obligation have been agreed, the lender and the borrower should meet to approve the formal agreement. Instructions for completing the document can be found in the Letter section. A debt certificate is essentially an unconditional written promise to repay a loan or other debts on a fixed or foreseeable date. Although legally enforceable, a debt instrument is less formal than a credit agreement and is suitable where small amounts of money are involved. However, its terms – which may contain a repayment date, interest rate and repayment plan – are safer than those of an IOU. In addition to facilitating business-to-business lending, debt instruments can also be used by individuals who wish to formalize their debts and loans to each other. A debt certificate or « promise of payment » is a note describing the money borrowed by a lender and the repayment structure. The document holds the borrower responsible for repaying the money (plus interest, if any). There are two types of bonds, covered and unsecured.

A secured note is an agreement on borrowed money, provided that, if it is not repaid to the lender, the collateral, which is normally an asset or real estate, is remitted to the lender. Therefore, an unsecured note is an agreement for borrowed money, although no assets or real estate are listed as collateral if the note remains unpaid. The raising of funds by issuing convertible bonds can be used either by a contract for the subscription of convertible bonds or by a convertible debt instrument. If a company has one (or very few) investors subscribing to the note, a convertible bond subscription agreement can be used. Conflicting Terms – It is said that no other agreement has any more legality or control over your debt note. Loan agreements and promissy notes are legally binding – and enforceable – documents that set out the terms of debt repayment. But a credit agreement normally contains more specific and stricter conditions, with greater obligations and restrictions for the borrower….

Non Collective Bargaining Agreement

This gives each person more flexibility to negotiate terms that are acceptable to them, but also offers less protection and fewer opportunities for the individual to protest corporate actions. For example, an employer cannot take revenge on a worker who is negotiating for participating in an organized strike, but for the worker who is not negotiating, there is no such protection – or even the ability to strike. In Finland, collective agreements are universal. This means that a collective agreement in a sector of activity becomes a universal legal minimum for everyone`s employment contract, whether unionized or not. For this condition to apply, half of the workers in this sector must be unionized and therefore support the agreement. As a general rule, the rules exclude certain supervisors and managers from negotiations. In some cases, those who are otherwise eligible for union membership have a « confidential » name. This excludes them, as they help in corporate activities or policies related to collective bargaining. In general, self-employed contractors and temporary or student workers are also not represented.

If there is some degree of approval among members – usually a majority of workers vote – they ratify the agreement. This binds all members to its provisions relating to the duration of the contract, whether or not the individual worker likes it. A single employee who negotiates cannot negotiate individually, agree on other terms or withdraw from the contract. The National Labor Relations Act, as well as state rules specific to certain employers or sectors, such as those of the California Public Employment Relations Board, allow companies to exclude small groups of employees from bargaining units. Such workers may not be represented by a trade union and may not engage in a protected concerted activity. This type of staff cannot join with others to negotiate employment issues. If collective bargaining has resulted in an agreement, for example an increase in wages, these agreements are called collective agreements. Collective agreements within the company can cover both unionized and non-union employees, as unions often negotiate on behalf of the staff employed in a given group. This group is referred to as a bargaining unit. A collective agreement, collective agreement (CLA) or collective agreement (CLA) is a written contract negotiated by one or more unions with the management of a company (or employers` organisation) that governs workers` working conditions.

This includes regulating workers` wages, benefits and obligations, as well as the obligations and responsibilities of the employer or employer, and often involves rules relating to the dispute settlement procedure. One of the purposes of a union is to negotiate with employers matters that concern its members and other workers. Once a union is recognized in a workplace, its negotiations with the employer are called collective bargaining; This negotiation will focus on working and employment conditions. . . .

New Collective Agreement Pa

With the exception of retroactive monetary provisions, new contractual conditions will enter into force on the date of signature. In cases where workers are subject to different collective agreements which do not have the same language, each worker is subject to the provisions of his collective agreement relating to his right to parental allowance and its amount. PSAC expects treasury board Phoenix to pay general damages (i.e. the lump sum of 2500 $US) within the above 180-day period for the implementation of the collective agreement. In addition, in the coming months, the Board of Directors will provide information on how current and former members who have suffered heavy losses as a result of Phoenix`s compensation system can claim additional compensation.

Mutual Recognition Agreements Between The Eu And Third Countries

MRAs are trade agreements aimed at facilitating market access and promoting greater international harmonization of compliance standards while protecting consumer safety. These agreements benefit regulators by reducing double inspections in any other area, allowing for a greater focus on higher-risk sites, and expanding inspection coverage of the global supply chain. 4. Directive 2013/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 amending Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications and Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation in the framework of the Internal Market Information System (hereinafter the IMI Regulation) /// OJ L 347, 31.12.2012, p. 4. OJ L 354 of 28.12.2013. pp. 132-170. Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRAs) promote trade in goods between the European Union and third countries and facilitate market access. These are bilateral agreements designed to benefit industry by facilitating access to conformity assessment. Mutual recognition agreements with third countries on the conformity assessment of products that provide for the use of a label in EU legislation are negotiated at the initiative of the EU.

The EU will negotiate on the basis of the conclusion, by the third countries concerned, with the EEA-EFTA States of parallel RHAs equivalent to those to be concluded with the EU. The EEA States shall cooperate in accordance with the general information and consultation procedures laid down in the EEA Agreement. If there is a difference in relations with third countries, it shall be dealt with in accordance with the relevant provisions of the EEA Agreement. On the one hand, industry and government institutions of international standards bodies are striving to establish common and universal technical regulations (e.g. CEN/CENELEC and ETSI at European level, ISO/IEC and ITU at international level); on the other hand, States interact directly (e.g. the European Community with third countries) to achieve mutual recognition of their conformity assessment procedures. This last point is particularly important where it has not been possible to agree on common rules or where it will not be possible, for other reasons, to draw up such rules in the foreseeable future. .

Monitoring Of The Implementation Of Delivery Agreement

The South African government has identified three major shortcomings that have led to poor implementation: however, progress was deemed too slow and « the Department of Civil Service and Administration`s own figures showed that citizens` satisfaction with service delivery in the final years of Thabo Mbeki`s presidency had risen from 75% in 2008 to 58% in 2008 ». [2] The result was that « President Jacob Zuma took office in 2009 amid a wave of protests by South Africans protesting the government`s poor record in providing basic services. » [3] The Lekgotla cabinet of January 2010 adopted 12 results for medium-term implementation by the government. The staff involved in the management of the system had experience in implementing management reform in the public sector. To improve public service delivery, Zuma created, in his first month at the Agency, the Ministry of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation (MSME) within the presidency, headed by the late Collins Chabane. « As a result of this process, we are committed to leading and promoting the implementation of Outcome 12, an efficient, efficient and development-oriented public service and an enabled, equitable and inclusive citizenship, » Baloyi said at a press conference in Parliament. There has been a public reaction to his government, with a series of major protests against President Zuma`s government in the first year. « Twenty-six public protests, including several violent ones, were recorded in seven of South Africa`s nine provinces in the first half of 2009.

Methods Of Agreement

(mu}_0 ^ast } ) is the average distortion of interest. Compliance limits are calculated in such a way that, if the assumptions described above are not valid, non-parametric methods should be considered. For example, Perez-Jaume and Carrasco propose a non-parametric alternative to the calculation of the ID, more stable and reliable than the parametric method when working with distorted data [30]. It is also relatively easy to calculate and less influenced by outliers or extremes than the parametric approach. The method is simply to calculate the quantils of an ordered list of paired differences to calculate the TDI. A bootstrap method can then be used to calculate the upper limit by recalculating at the patient level and then recalculating the TDI for each new bootstrap calculation. This seems to be the same as a perzentile method first described by Bland and Altman [5], except that, in the case of repeated measures, we use the start resampling to get the upper limit. Although it does not adopt a normal distribution, we must nevertheless consider that the differences are independent and distributed identically. Other non-parametric methods are available [31, 32]. Stevens [33] also developed a generalization of the probability of concordance based on the moment method, which does not require any distribution assumptions for true values. Full versions of the Limits of Agreement method have also been proposed, for example the Schluters Bayes tuning method [34].

In addition, Barnhart [12] and Barnhart et al. [11] an interesting method that uses generalized estimation equations to provide a non-parametric estimate of CP. Recently, Jang et al. [35] proposed a new set of correspondence indices adapted to contexts where there are several heterogeneous evaluators and variances. The Coefficient of Individual Agreement (CIA) was developed by Haber and Barnhart [8] and Barnhart et al[9]. This is an evolutionary coefficient that directly compares the disagreement between the devices and the disagreement within the devices within the subjects [27, 28]. The CIA`s main focus is on quantifying the magnitude of variability between different devices versus variability within devices. The CIA value ranges from 0 to 1.1 indicating that the use of different devices makes no difference in the variability of repeated measurements made under the same conditions within the same subject. The residual error variation ({sigma}_e^2 ) represents the variability of repeated measurements made under the same conditions within the same subject, and it is therefore important that it is a reliable comparison measure. As recommended by others [27, 28], we check whether this value is appropriate by calculating the repeatability coefficient of Bland and Altman, which is 1.96sqrt {2 { sigma} _e^2}. There are different variants of the CIA, but we follow others using the mean quadratic deviation as a measure of disagreement [27, 28]. We follow in particular that of Haber et al.

[28] the approach of repeated concordant measures, which indicates that the CIA`s calculation should be based on Carrasco JL, Caceres A, Escaramis G, Jover L. Distinction and compliance with continuous data. Stat Med. 2014;33 (1):117-28. Barnhart HX, Haber MJ, Lin LI. An overview of conformity assessment for continuous measures. J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17 (4):529-69.

Symbolically, the common method of conformity and difference can be presented as: Carstensen B, Simpson J, Gurrin LC. Statistical models to assess compliance with comparative studies of methods with replication measures. Int J Biostat. 2008;4(1):16. The common method is to apply both the concordance method and the difference method as shown in the graph above. The application of the common method should therefore tell us that this time it is beef that is the cause. . . .

Master Services Agreement Form

All confidential information (as defined below) that is disclosed in this document remains the exclusive and confidential property of the disclosed party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the receiving party may disclose the disclosing party`s confidential information, (a) to the extent necessary to comply with any laws, rules, regulations or decisions applicable to it, and (b) to the extent necessary to respond to summonses or subpoenas or litigation, provided that the party that received prior notice of such forced disclosure (to the extent that: And appropriate assistance, at the expense of the disclosing party, if the disclosing party wishes to challenge the disclosure. At the request of the disclosed party, the receiving party will return or destroy all confidential information of the disclosed party that is in its possession….

Mackenzie Health Collective Agreement

The National Union of Public and General Employees (NUPGE) is one of the largest labour organizations in Canada with over 390,000 members. Our mission is to improve the lives of working families and build a stronger Canada by ensuring that our shared wealth is used for the common good. — NUPGE. . . . These employees are employed by Sodexo and the newest of more than 1,200 Mackenzie Health employees who join OPSEU, including office and office, service and diagnostic imaging employees….